A contestant impersonating PM Narendra Modi turns the tables on Kunal Kamra during Samay Raina’s India’s Got Latent Season 2, sparking laughter and online buzz.
.webp63b4c3f4-c7cb-4296-bab8-af56b6873f28.webp)
Indian comedy has delivered another unexpected viral moment, this time involving a contestant impersonating Prime Minister Narendra Modi and comedian Kunal Kamra. The exchange took place during the latest episode of India’s Got Latent, hosted by Samay Raina, where a planned roast quickly turned into a lively back-and-forth that left the panel and audience laughing.
The contestant, Rahil, introduced as “Odi Ji,” appeared in a Modi-inspired look and used the familiar style of political speeches to deliver punchlines. What made the segment particularly entertaining was the surprise appearance of Kunal Kamra through a video call, creating an opportunity for the two performers to exchange jokes.
Rather than following the expected script of the interaction, Rahil took the initiative and directed several jokes at Kamra. References to WhatsApp forwards, the falling rupee and the controversy surrounding the show’s earlier history gave the conversation a topical edge.
The moment also revived a question familiar to fans of the series: whether audiences want another season of the comedy show.
Rahil appeared as a contestant on India’s Got Latent Season 2, adopting the speech patterns, mannerisms and public-speaking style associated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Introduced as “Odi Ji,” he began his performance with familiar greetings and a confident delivery designed to establish the impersonation. He then moved beyond imitation, using improvisation and audience interaction to build a comedy routine around the show itself.
One of his early talking points was the possibility of Season 3. His question about whether viewers wanted another season received an enthusiastic response from the audience, setting up one of the episode’s recurring jokes.
The act also included playful references to Samay Raina’s return to the spotlight and the difficulties associated with the show’s earlier controversies. By mixing topical references with exaggerated political-style delivery, Rahil created a performance that extended beyond a straightforward celebrity impersonation.
The distinction is important: Rahil was impersonating the Prime Minister. Narendra Modi himself was not participating in the comedy segment.
The segment took an unexpected turn when Samay Raina brought Kunal Kamra into the conversation through a video call.
The setup created the possibility of a roast between Kamra and the Modi impersonator. However, Rahil quickly began directing jokes at Kamra, shifting the focus of the interaction.
He referred to the controversy surrounding Habitat Studio, a venue associated with earlier events involving Raina and Kamra. He also made a joke about the falling rupee, using the familiar language of political promises to deliver his punchline.
Kamra responded with his own wordplay, keeping the exchange moving. But Rahil continued to interrupt and challenge him, turning the interaction into a contest of quick responses rather than a conventional interview or scripted conversation.
The panel’s reactions helped amplify the moment. Instead of remaining a brief guest appearance, the video call became a central part of Rahil’s performance.
For viewers, the appeal came from the unpredictability of the exchange. A segment that began with a political impersonation evolved into a roast involving two comedians with very different performance styles.
One of the most talked-about moments came when Rahil dismissed Kamra’s remark as something resembling a WhatsApp forward.
The joke tapped into a familiar feature of Indian online culture: the circulation of messages, political claims and punchlines through family and community WhatsApp groups. The phrase has become a popular way of questioning whether a statement is original, verified or simply repeated from somewhere else.
In the context of the show, the remark worked as a direct comeback rather than a general observation about social media. It also gave the audience an easily recognisable reference that could be clipped and shared online.
Kamra continued to respond, and the two traded remarks in a fast-moving exchange. The humour depended not only on the lines themselves but also on timing, interruptions and the contrast between Rahil’s political impersonation and Kamra’s established stand-up persona.
The interaction illustrates why short comedy clips often spread rapidly across social platforms. A self-contained exchange with recognisable personalities, topical references and a clear punchline can reach audiences well beyond those who watched the full episode.
Political impersonation has long been part of comedy, allowing performers to exaggerate public figures’ speech patterns and turn familiar political language into satire.
In Rahil’s performance, the Modi-inspired persona provided the framework for jokes about the economy, public controversies and the show’s own future. The character was not simply used to imitate a public figure; it became a vehicle for interacting with other performers.
The appearance of Kamra added another layer. Known for political commentary and provocative stand-up material, Kamra became the target of the impersonator’s jokes, creating a reversal of expectations for the audience.
This kind of format depends heavily on improvisation. Performers must respond quickly, maintain their characters and keep the exchange entertaining without allowing the conversation to lose momentum.
It also demonstrates the role of digital platforms in modern comedy. A full episode may contain several performances, but one short exchange can become the most visible moment online. Audiences share clips, repeat memorable lines and debate who delivered the strongest comeback.
That attention can bring renewed interest to the programme, its contestants and its host, even among viewers who do not regularly follow the entire series.
The exchange also referred to the controversy surrounding Habitat Studio, the Mumbai venue linked to earlier events involving India’s Got Latent and Kunal Kamra.
The venue became a point of discussion after a controversy surrounding Kamra’s comedy and the resulting fallout involving the show’s wider circle. During Rahil’s act, references to the studio and the possibility of renewed trouble were used as punchlines.
Samay Raina joined in with a joke about the possibility of the clip attracting attention from the cyber cell. The line played on the legal and public scrutiny that had followed earlier controversies.
Within the performance, these references functioned as comedy material. They should be understood as part of the exchange rather than as confirmation of any new legal action.
The ability to revisit a controversial episode through humour can generate attention, but it also shows how public disputes can continue to shape the reception of entertainment content long after the original incident.
The question of a third season became another highlight of Rahil’s performance.
During the act, he asked the audience whether they wanted India’s Got Latent Season 3. The crowd responded enthusiastically, turning the question into a recurring joke during the segment.
For fans, the moment naturally raised curiosity about the show’s future. However, an audience response during a comedy routine is not the same as an official renewal announcement.
The programme’s return for Season 2 had already attracted attention because of the anticipation surrounding Samay Raina’s next project. The latest episode demonstrates that the format continues to generate shareable moments and discussion among viewers.
Whether the series will return for a third season depends on an official announcement. Until then, the exchange is best viewed as a playful way of involving the audience in the show’s ongoing conversation.
Rahil’s performance ended on a strong note. He continued the political-style jokes and returned to the question of whether viewers wanted another season.
The judging panel awarded him a score of 10 each, and he emerged as the winner of the segment.
The episode also featured Tanmay Bhat, MC Stan, Madhur Virli and Arpit Bala on the panel. Their presence added to the mix of comedy styles and reactions throughout the show.
Rahil’s success was not based only on the visual resemblance or mannerisms of his impersonation. His ability to improvise, react to the panel and keep the jokes moving helped turn the act into a memorable television moment.
The exchange with Kamra provided an additional highlight, giving the performance a second layer of attention beyond the initial impersonation.
The viral appeal of the segment comes from several elements working together: a recognisable political impersonation, a surprise video call, an exchange between comedians and references to issues already familiar to online audiences.
The WhatsApp joke was particularly accessible because it drew on an everyday experience shared by millions of people. Meanwhile, the Season 3 question gave fans an opportunity to express their interest in the programme’s future.
The interaction also offered the kind of unexpected reversal that works well in comedy. Kamra was brought into the segment, but the contestant quickly took control of the exchange, creating a roast that neither followed a predictable script nor depended on a single punchline.
As clips circulate, viewers may interpret the exchange differently depending on their views of the performers and their taste in political humour. Its popularity reflects the continuing influence of short-form video in shaping conversations around Indian entertainment.
For India’s Got Latent, the episode has provided another memorable moment built around spontaneity, topical jokes and audience participation.